prices verified june 2026 · 3 workflows · monthly billing

Zapier vs Automatisch — pricing & features compared

Zapier logoZapier vs Automatisch logoAutomatisch
These two sit at opposite ends of the market. Automatisch is open-source and self-hosted, so across the volumes we track its cost is just the server it runs on, while Zapier is a fully managed cloud service priced per task with by far the larger catalog (9,000+ apps vs about 50). Automatisch trades breadth and convenience for data control and a flat running cost; Zapier trades higher pricing for reach and a no-code editor anyone can use. See the price table below for figures.

What you'd pay per month

Cheapest qualifying plan for each tool, including overage, at four typical volumes.

runs / monthZapierAutomatisch
1,000 $73.5Professional 2k $8 self-hosted*
5,000 $193.5Professional 10k $8 self-hosted*
20,000 $433.5Professional 50k $25 self-hosted*
100,000 $1,149Professional 200k $45 self-hosted*

~ = estimated custom-tier pricing (vendor quotes individually; calibrated against public list prices). Assumes 3 workflows, monthly billing, cheapest qualifying plan. Prices verified June 2026 — see the price changelog. * self-hosted = free open-source software; the figure is the server infrastructure (VPS + DB, not a tool fee), ~$8/mo small to ~$150/mo at high volume — assumes light workflows and excludes your ops time.

Get the number for your exact volume.

30 seconds, no signup — your runs, your workflows, all 7 tools ranked.

Open the calculator →

Feature differences that matter

Only the rows where Zapier and Automatisch actually differ — identical capabilities are left out.

FeatureZapierAutomatisch
Integrations9,000+50+
Free tier100 tasks/mo · Unlimited (within task limit)Unlimited* · Unlimited*
Steps per workflow2 steps (free)Unlimited
Execution timeout15 minNo limit*
Log history15 min delay (free)Full history*
EU data residency
Self-hosting
AI features
Multi-user
API access
Code steps
LicenseProprietary (cloud)AGPL-3.0

Same on both: overage model · webhooks.

Pros & cons

Zapier logoZapier
  • 9,000+ integrations — most of any tool
  • Easiest for non-technical users
  • Huge ecosystem
  • Most expensive per op
  • Free tier severely limited
  • No self-host
Automatisch logoAutomatisch
  • Simplest setup
  • Full data control (GDPR)
  • Unlimited on self-host
  • Only ~50 integrations
  • No AI nodes
  • Smallest community

Common questions

From published pricing, Automatisch is the lower-cost option across the volumes we track — $8 vs $73.5 at 1,000 runs/mo, and $45 vs $1,149 at 100,000. Figures include overage where it applies — see the table above. Price is one factor; the feature and trade-off sections cover the rest.
In Zapier, one task = one action step — a 3-step Zap triggered 100 times consumes 300 tasks. Automatisch doesn't meter operations — one flat cloud price, or self-host for free.
Automatisch yes — self-hosting makes it nearly free at any volume. Zapier is cloud-only.
When breadth and zero setup matter most. Zapier connects 9,000+ apps — often the only tool that supports a niche or legacy system — and its point-and-click editor and template library let a non-technical person ship automations without running any infrastructure.
Taken from official pricing pages and verified June 2026. Values marked ~ are estimates for custom enterprise tiers. Every change we record lands in the price changelog.

Both have free tiers — test with your real workflow

Zapier logoZapier

100 free tasks a month on 2-step Zaps — fine for checking whether your apps are supported.

Visit Zapier →
Automatisch logoAutomatisch

Open source — self-host for free, or take the flat-price cloud plan.

Visit Automatisch →

An objective cost comparison from each vendor's public pricing pages (June 2026) — not a recommendation; rankings reflect price only, so verify current pricing before deciding. We run an affiliate link for Make (the only one of these tools with a public referral program); the others don't offer one, so those are plain links — affiliate status never affects the comparison. See our affiliate disclosure.