prices verified june 2026 · 3 workflows · monthly billing

Pipedream vs Activepieces — pricing & features compared

Pipedream logoPipedream vs Activepieces logoActivepieces
Both are developer-friendly, but the cost and hosting models differ. Activepieces is MIT-licensed and runs free on its cloud free tier or self-hosted (cost is your server), while Pipedream is a managed cloud platform priced in credits once you pass its small free tier. Pipedream offers deeper code-first workflows (Node.js/Python with npm/PyPI); Activepieces offers a Zapier-like no-code UI plus self-hosting and an open license. See the price table below for figures.

What you'd pay per month

Cheapest qualifying plan for each tool, including overage, at four typical volumes.

runs / monthPipedreamActivepieces
1,000 $45Basic $0 Cloud
5,000 $75Basic +ops $0 Cloud
20,000 $153Basic +ops $0 Cloud
100,000 $309.6Basic +ops $0 Cloud

~ = estimated custom-tier pricing (vendor quotes individually; calibrated against public list prices). Assumes 3 workflows, monthly billing, cheapest qualifying plan. Prices verified June 2026 — see the price changelog.

Get the number for your exact volume.

30 seconds, no signup — your runs, your workflows, all 7 tools ranked.

Open the calculator →

Feature differences that matter

Only the rows where Pipedream and Activepieces actually differ — identical capabilities are left out.

FeaturePipedreamActivepieces
Integrations3,000+747+
Free tier100 credits/mo · 3Unlimited runs · 10 active flows (cloud)
Execution timeout30 sec (free) / 12 min (paid)No limit*
Log history24 hours (free)7 days (cloud)
EU data residency
Self-hosting
LicenseProprietary (cloud)MIT

Same on both: overage model · steps per workflow · ai features · multi-user · api access · webhooks · code steps.

Pros & cons

Pipedream logoPipedream
  • Run Node.js/Python in workflows
  • 3,000+ integrations
  • Best for devs
  • Overage no longer public — quote only
  • Very limited free tier
  • No self-host
Activepieces logoActivepieces
  • True MIT license — no restrictions
  • No-code UI like Zapier
  • Self-hostable
  • Fewer integrations than Zapier (747+)
  • Smaller community than n8n
  • No code steps

Common questions

From published pricing, Activepieces is the lower-cost option across the volumes we track — $0 vs $45 at 1,000 runs/mo, and $0 vs $309.6 at 100,000. Figures include overage where it applies — see the table above. Price is one factor; the feature and trade-off sections cover the rest.
In Pipedream, one credit ≈ 30 seconds of compute time (at 256 MB) — billed on execution time, not step count, so a typical run is about one credit. Activepieces doesn't meter runs at all — pricing is per active flow, with unlimited executions.
Activepieces yes — self-hosting makes it nearly free at any volume. Pipedream is cloud-only.
When your team writes code and wants a fully managed platform. Pipedream runs Node.js/Python steps with npm/PyPI packages, an event-data inspector and an API-first design — a powerful developer experience with no infrastructure to operate.
Taken from official pricing pages and verified June 2026. Values marked ~ are estimates for custom enterprise tiers. Every change we record lands in the price changelog.

Both have free tiers — test with your real workflow

Pipedream logoPipedream

Free tier gives 100 credits a month on 3 workflows — enough to validate an integration.

Visit Pipedream →
Activepieces logoActivepieces

10 active flows free with unlimited runs — a real pilot costs nothing.

Visit Activepieces →

An objective cost comparison from each vendor's public pricing pages (June 2026) — not a recommendation; rankings reflect price only, so verify current pricing before deciding. We run an affiliate link for Make (the only one of these tools with a public referral program); the others don't offer one, so those are plain links — affiliate status never affects the comparison. See our affiliate disclosure.